The judge considers the probable cause to hold a trump in criminal contempt over the removal of Venezuelan migrants in El Salvador star-news.press/wp

Washington – The Federal Judge said on Wednesday that there is a probable cause to find Trump administration in criminal contempt for what he said that her defiance was to cover the aircraft in turn Wearing Venezuelan migrants Who were tied to El Salvador.

U.S. District Judge James Boasberg wrote UA Decision of 46 pages For the government’s proceedings 15. March “shows deliberately neglect” for his order for the government to transmit certain migrants in salvadoran custody according to war alien enemies.

These actions, whether “sufficient that the court concluded that there was a probable cause in criminal contempt. He did not actually give accused sufficient opportunities to correct or explain their actions. No their answers satisfactorily.”

“The Constitution does not apply for the deliberate disobedience of court orders – especially officials of the coordinates of the branch that swore the oath to adhere to it,” Boasberg wrote.

The judge’s decision marks the most vulnerable rebuke of the administration’s trump in the middle of its escalating tension with the federal judiciary, who particularly grew from the challenge to the president’s efforts around immigration.

President Trump and his allies have been attacked by Boasberg repeatedly through his handling of the case that came after the president brought a proclamation in March, referring to Action Eamenes ActRarely used Law from 1798. year, in order to concisely deport the Venezuelan, which of its administrative claims are members of the gang tran de Aragua.

The judge said that Trump administration can eliminate the violation of his orders before he acted the process of contingent by claiming the migrants that were removed because they can claim their right to dispute their amendment. Administration officers will also have the opportunity to suggest “other methods” in accordance with the order, written by Boasberg.

The director of the Communications White House Steven Cheung said that the administration from the US Court of Appeal in the United States will ask the US Court for the DC Circle.

“The President is 100% dedicated to ensuring that terrorists and criminal illegal migrants are no longer threatening to Americans and their communities across the country,” he said in the statement.

Boasberg, sitting in the District Court in Washington, DC, supervised the group of Venezuelan migrants who tried to prevent their removal in more than 200 years of war. The judge quickly blocked Trump’s Administration to remove the plaintiffs from the US 14 days and, after conjunction of an emergency debate, they said to government lawyers to return the people who were back in the USA in the USA

The written order was issued soon after the blocking of the Trump administration that in his detention performs any deportation of unaffected in his custody for alien enemies. Boasberg’s order did not block the government from deportation of alleged members of the gang or others under other immigration authorities.

But the judge said that in spite of written and oral directives, the government did not stop the process of removal, and aircraft who was transported by deportation towards alien enemies, where most were transferred on it Center for Control of Terrorism or Cecot.

Shares of Trump administration have launched questions whether the Boasbers order broke. Judge wrote in his opinion that “praised” by the State Secretary of Marco Rubio and Salvadoran President Nayib Boukel “was evaluated that they were conceived and cheerfully defied by the court’s order.”

Whoever ordered exactly in Trump administration that two planes continue at El Salvador, unclear. In his opinion, Boasberg wrote that he plans to reveal it through further proceedings and potentially live testimony under oath if necessary.

At the last hearing on the issue, the Judicial Attorney called two departments for Homeland Officers for the Homeland and One State Department of the Officer after the judge, but he said he did not know who directed who directed who directed the planes.

Boasberg determined that Trump Management did not cut any concerns to violate his injunction, and during further proceedings were rejected “recognized to the grave error, explain how it turned and detailed to correct.”

He accused the Government “All major Obstructism” and “Stonewalling” over his refusal to respond to the basic issues that have focused whether they were unexpectedly exclusively under the proclamation of Mr. American detention after the judge issued his order.

“The accused do not give a more convincing reason to avoid the conclusion that seems obvious to the above recirculation, and, separately, written compliance,” compliant, “compliance wrote,” compliance.

Dispute over the use of Mr. Trump Action Eamenes Action to remove the alleged member tran de Aragua reached the Supreme Court At the end of last month. Senior court said last week that Trump administration could continue deportations of venezuelan migrants He claims that members are Tren de Aragu by law, but only if they give them the procedure.

The High Court also said that migrants dispute their removal towards an alien act, they must seek judicial audit through Habeas Petitions filed in the district in which they were detained. As a result, the dispute before Boasberg in Washington, DC, instead, he should be filed in Texas, where Venezuelan migrants were closed, the Supreme Court said.

Boasberg wrote that the order of the Supreme Court “does not affect – let alone the Moot – an inquiry with aligned in accordance with that.”

The Trump Administration called on the privilege of state secrets in an effort to encourage Boasberg’s reach in its efforts to find out more about two flights. But the referee found that “extremely doubtful that the privilege here applies” because he did not ask about diplomatic agreements between the United States and El Salvador, nor the operational specifics on how organized deportations were.

“Instead, the Court simply asks to confirm the times and numbers: how many passengers do two flights, whether everyone is deported in accordance with the proclamation, and when they were transferred from American detention,” Boasberg wrote. “The court is skeptical that such information is growing at the state secret level.”

The judge also rejected the contents of the Trump administration that his order violated the President’s body, saying that these were only limited executive procedures, which courts are routinely working.

“In no way attacked any article II authority, despite the efforts of the accused to invest new to existence,” he wrote. “In any case, even if the three somehow exceeded the article II and the Court, the accused cannot avoid contempt on the basis of that.”

Boasberg said that if the management and judiciary trash do not prosecute their criminal contempt of a court case, he will appoint someone who will.