UEFA Fine Chelsea and Aston Villa for financial rules offense star-news.press/wp

Chelsea has provided £ 27 million records for UEFA to break financial regulations with the threat of £ 51.8 million among penalties. Aston Villa, Barcelona and Lyon have received fines: £ 9.5 million, £ 13 billion and £ 10.8 million respectively, in the case of a club that violates the UEFA government rules. Chelsea is fine in a club in the biggest UEFA that has ever imposed.

The penalties come from the two UEFA rule offenses: the rule of football, which reproduced the Financial Fair and the financial loss of the club and the cost rules of the quad, can spend salaries, transfers and operating fees. This limit is set up in 80 percent and will be dropped to 70% in the 2025-26 season.

Chelsea spilled £ 17.2 million to violate the profit rule of football and overcome £ 9.5 million squad limit. Villa fines were £ 4.3 million and £ 5.2 million for the same offenses. The two clubs now face future fines for £ 51.8 million for Chels and 13 million pounds villa.

Under these settlements, UEFA has established restrictions in Chelsea, Villa and Barcelona in terms of the ability to register new players for UEFA competitions. Specifically, the clubs may not be added to the player list (right to play in UEFA Club competitions). This effectively means that new signatures can be registered if the sales of players are financially compensate.

Offense Chelsea follows the extensive expense after Cloehly / Clearlake Consortium after taking the club in May 2022. The club’s transfer is aggressive, more than hundreds of million pounds captured UEFA’s attention, sharp standard accounts than the Premier League. Unlike the upper flight of England flight, UEFA did not have the income of the clubs of goods. This attitude has not been sale in Chelsea for sale in their women’s team for sale in their parents’ sale of 70.5 million clubs to sell hotels to a sister company.

UEFA stated that the club’s financial control body (CFCB) closely examined such transactions, especially the sales of tangible and intangible assets and benefits from them, calculating relevant income. The organization also revised the exchanges of the players, including Chelsea and Aston Villa, if adjustments in financial assessments of clubs.

A noteworthy transaction signed Chelsea’s 19 million £ 18-year-old Omari Kellyman from Villa, despite being a minimum higher experience. At the same time, the Chelsea Academy graduates Ian Maatsen in the opposite direction for 37.5 million pounds. Creating Creative Accounting suspects, clubs are aimed at profitability and sustainability rules, especially in the Premier League, where these types of mutual transfers were converted to the summer window of 2023.

UEFA Judgment-Chelsea, Villa and Barcelona participated in three clubs, have entered multi-year settlement agreements, which meet financial penalties and obligations. Chelsea’s agreement will last four years until the season 2028-29, the villas for three years, and Barcelona. These settlements are designed to maintain the clubs within financial advances, while the transfer is limited to flexibility in the market, if they do not maintain economic balance.

It is important that the fines established as part of these UEFA agreements will not be financial losses in the future UEFA evaluations, allowing clubs to better manage their financial plans and maintain loss within the limits of loss.

In response to the court, Chelsea recognized a public statement to acknowledge the offense and confirms cooperation with the UEFA during the process. The club has said that he presented a full and transparent financial report for tax 2022/23 and 2023/24. The penalty was accepted to overcome the Queen Cost Ratio, which UEFA said it was between 80 and 90 percent in 2024 for 2024 per cent.

Chelsea stated that he valued a relationship with UEFA and chose to quickly repair through a substance of the subject. The club also emphasized that their financial performance is in a strong rising route and proposed that corrective measures are already in force.

In general, the UEFA decision marks important moments to enforce its financial sustainability regulations. With unprecedented fines, strict record limits and multi-year agreements, the European body sends a clear signal that creative accounting and excessive expenditure will encounter strong sanctions.

The elite clubs browsing in these regulations that the capabilities of competing in UEFA competitions may have increasingly disciplined financial management and prudent transfer activity.